Bring us a migration, data bottleneck, signing challenge, or integration requirement. We scope the work, assemble the right technology and specialists, and deliver against agreed acceptance criteria.
You don’t need to know which protocol or tool fits. Pick the situation closest to yours.
“We have an EVM application and need a credible Solana launch plan — without our Solidity team stalling for six months.”
Cryptuon scopes, migrates, and tests EVM applications for Solana (and Stacks), delivering a costed plan and tested programs against written acceptance criteria.
How we deliver it →“Our historical blockchain data is becoming too expensive to store and query, and we need to decide whether to change providers or change our architecture.”
Cryptuon benchmarks your real Solana data workload, compares provider, hybrid, and self-managed options, then redesigns, migrates, and operates the one that wins.
How we deliver it →“We need to change our validator infrastructure without introducing signing risk.”
Cryptuon reviews, rehearses, and executes validator signer changes with failure drills, policy, and monitoring, so migrations do not create conflicting signatures.
How we deliver it →“Our agent needs to pay for services, and we want to pay contributors in USDC only after an accepted action — but we need spending controls, approvals, and books that reconcile.”
Cryptuon runs controlled pilots for agent spending and accepted-action USDC payouts: bounded budgets, named approvers, evidence, and reconciliation you can audit.
How we deliver it →Start with a fixed-fee assessment. Everything after it is scoped in writing before it begins.
Tell us what you need to launch, fix, integrate, or operate — and when it has to work. No product knowledge required.
We measure the real workload or codebase and compare options, including ones that do not use our technology.
A fixed scope, milestones, exclusions, and the tests that define “done”. You approve before any build starts.
We assemble the technology and specialists, deliver against the criteria, and can operate the result afterwards.
Cryptuon contracts for the outcome and answers for every specialist and provider it brings in.
How engagements work →Deliverables, exclusions, and the tests that define “done” are agreed in writing before a build starts.
See what you can buy →Every component’s evidence level, audit status, and known limitations — published, not discovered later.
Read the register →Published work on atomic composability, DePIN, MEV, and verification informs how we design systems.
Browse research →MIT-licensed and maintained by Cryptuon, each with its own site, docs, and repository. We use them where testing on your workload supports them — and recommend alternatives where it doesn’t.
Compiler
A Solidity-to-Solana compiler framework — write contracts in familiar Solidity syntax and compile to native Solana BPF programs with full Anchor compatibility and automatic PDA derivation.
Publicly tested Maturity 2 of 4 · Source; compiles to Rust/Anchor you can reviewValidator security
An open-source policy-enforcing trust boundary for proof-of-stake validators — it sits between clients and signing keys, enforcing EIP-3076 slashing-prevention rules before any signature is produced.
Publicly tested Maturity 2 of 4 · Source; Web3Signer-compatible APIRust library
A Rust library that compresses blockchain data losslessly using Zstandard plus custom dictionaries trained on Solana-specific byte patterns — up to 60:1 on archival workloads with the MaxCompression preset.
Publicly tested Maturity 2 of 4 · crates.ioCross-chain / DeFi
A cross-rollup atomic swap protocol for Ethereum L2s — Vyper contracts plus a Rust relayer enforce all-or-nothing swaps with commit-reveal MEV protection, no bridges or wrapped assets.
Publicly tested Maturity 2 of 4 · Source + public test suite (not all scenarios pass yet); deployable to EVM testnetsEVM / Runtime
A high-performance, embeddable Ethereum Virtual Machine in Zig — 96+ opcodes, wave-based parallel execution for a 5-6x throughput gain, and native FFI bindings for Python, Rust, JavaScript, and C.
Publicly tested Maturity 2 of 4 · Source + test suite; FFI bindings for Python, Rust, JS, CTrading bot
An open-source, agent-driven trading framework for prediction markets — 25+ typed tools across Polymarket, Kalshi, Opinion DEX, and Binance, with paper-trading by default and human-in-the-loop approvals.
Publicly tested Maturity 2 of 4 · Source; paper trading by defaultA portfolio is an argument about where the difficulty lies. Here is ours, stated plainly enough to be wrong.
The consolidation that has been predicted every year for a decade keeps not happening, because chains differ on properties that genuinely trade off against each other — execution model, settlement assurance, fee structure, and the developer population each one attracts. If that is permanent rather than temporary, then compilers that target several chains, swap protocols that do not assume a shared settlement layer, and state synchronisation that spans execution environments are infrastructure rather than stopgaps. Most of this portfolio only makes sense if that bet is right.
Very little of what is hard here is hard because a machine is too slow. It is hard because several parties who do not trust each other need to agree on an ordering, a verdict, or a settlement, and need to do it without a referee. That is why the same few primitives keep reappearing across unrelated products: a commit-reveal window to stop anyone acting on someone else’s undisclosed input, staked reputation to make dishonesty expensive, and a hash on a public chain to make a record contestable by someone who was not there.
Infrastructure gets adopted when the cost of evaluating it approaches zero and the cost of leaving it is knowable in advance. MIT licensing with no contributor agreement, no withheld commercial edition, and no shared runtime that every project imports is what makes both of those true here. It also imposes a discipline worth having: if the code is the product and anyone can read it, the documentation has to be accurate rather than persuasive.
The research behind these positions is on the research page, the engineering write-ups are under Insights, and the open-source projects are where each bet is acted on.
A short brief is enough — the outcome, what is blocking it, and your timeframe. We reply with what a scoped assessment would cover and cost.